The CEO of Channel One, Konstantin Ernst, does not regret the departure of the program host of the Let Let program they talk to Andrrei Malakhov and comedian Yevgeny Petrosyan to Russian TV channel 1. This was said by Ernst itself. Thank you for disappearing, he recalled the words of the song Nautilus Pompilius.
Malakhov transferred from the first person to Russia 1 in 2017, his conversion process caused an extensive resonance between the audience. The host himself explained this with the desire to create programs and conflicts with his own leadership. Petrosyan left the country's main channel into the number 0. According to him, his departure was related to the leader's desire to divide the winding mirror of Muslims into several programs. Regarding the way and reason why Malakhov and Petrosyan left channel one – in Ura.ru.
Malakhov left the first person
Reasons for the conversion process
In 2017, Malakhov said that he moved from channel one to Russia 1 and will lead the Andrrei Androng Malakhov program there. Live broadcast “and others. After that, he thanked Ernst for the common work and transferred experience.
The landlord explained that the reason for his conversion process is “the crisis of the genre in everything.” Malakhov wants to gain independence, constantly executing orders by a soldier. He often makes important, because it seems to him, topics to illuminate the program, but the government refused him because it was not his topic. In addition, according to him, especially the first canal of the channel burned what was expensive to him, especially, moved the shooting of the previous season from the regular studio to Ostankino to others.
The plans of Mikhail Efremov after escaping from the temporary hypertension have been revealed
During such a crisis, the host came to an invitation to become his own program producer about Russia 1. The landlord did not comment on rumors that the reason for the transition to another channel was a conflict with producer Natalya Nikonova, who returned from VGTRK to the first channel and political requirements. Malakhov emphasized that this conversion process is not connected to money, because in Russia 1, he is provided with income equivalent to the One channel.
Additional details about the departure of Malakhov
Later, in September 2021, he added his explanation in the atmosphere “simply open”. The host said that on the first channel, he was always a “operating boy”. For a while, he was satisfied with this, but after that, his patience could not stand it because the university students of the manufacturers. The host noted that when the producer Nikonov, who conflicted with the leadership for a long time, returned to the first channel, she was suddenly forgiven and appointed Malakhov's head of the program.
And they told us: she is your leader. Hello! I don't understand anything! And for seven consecutive years, what is it? But no one explains anything. They said, take it. But I'm not 20 years old!
Rumors on the media
Regarding the conversion of Malakhov to another channel, the media began to disseminate information that the reason for this was a conflict with the leadership due to the intention of the maternity host. According to ELLE, the host who wants to leave the maternity leave for his wife's pregnancy, but the leader refused. The producer of the conversation program is accused of claiming that the host should choose between work on television programs and maternity leave. The sources of the publication claim that Malakhov considers such an unacceptable request.
Petrosyan's departure from the first time
Petrosyan left the One channel in 2004 – his program out there throughout the year. Later, the comedian moved to Russia 1. However, his departure was followed by revenge from Channel One. This was said by the artist itself. According to Petrosyan, his own and programs are often mocked in KVN, comedy clubs and other projects.
They had such an installation. They were forced to do this
The reason for the humorous transition to another channel is because the winding mirror, want to create parts according to different programs. Later, he was asked to return for the first time, but he refused. As he claims, the problem is not money, but the leader does not provide all the opportunities for the creative process.
I left, they didn't want me to leave. But they took me to the pen, the artist concluded.